US industry group highlights concerns with EPA’s 'orphan' HPV proposal
The US Society of Chemical Manufacturers and Affiliates (Socma) has highlighted two major concerns with proposals from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for addressing 45 'orphan' chemicals from the High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program, and the new approach to issuing significant new use rules (SNURs) (CW 19 January 2012).
The society's first concern is that the fourth HPV test rule, if finalised, could result in a clash with 2013 REACH registrations. The new proposal would require US manufacturers currently implementing tests for the EU deadline to test the same substances twice in order to meet the EPA's requirement for non-OECD test protocols. Socma highlights this would incur significant expense to generate information that is most likely already available, and argues that the EPA should accept data being generated for REACH and work closely with ECHA to leverage data it may already have.
In addition, Socma emphasises that it would be unfair to use SNURs to compel testing, as this could also result in a duplication of reporting, and is unnecessary.
The society concludes that EPA should continue to harmonise test protocols with other nations, and to formalise data-sharing agreements to enable it to utilise work already conducted outside of the US. The agency should also look to its enhanced chemical data reporting rule to address potential concerns with existing chemicals and to prioritise those chemicals.
© CW Research Ltd. You may circulate web links to our articles, but you may not copy our articles in whole or in part without permission.
Further information
Sign up to free news
Chemical Watch Forum
- ECHA decision letters delay - Chris Braun
- Amendments to REACH Annex I and XIII - Nik Robinson
- Use of Chesar tool - Ineke Gubbels
- The importance of confidential business information - Ernie Rosenberg
- Reduced supply and choice of suppliers due to non-registration - Jon Hughes
- SIEF costs vary widely - Anon
- Who is the importer for REACH in complex supply chains - Anon
- CLP and empty diamonds: what’s the right approach? - Michael Paetzold
- "On the shelves" and "placed on the market" - PGO
- Use of NONS data: is it free, or do you need an agreement? - Franck Thiebault



